Sequestration

Seriously? The "most working" plan is the one that was intended to be so bad that it would be horrific if it happened? And yet, Dems and Reps seem to agree that it's better than compromising (which would look bad to their voter/supporters.) I thought they were going to do a last minute "compromise but moan about it." But now I think the "temporary sequester" is going to be a "permanent sequester". Which is fine, I don't think we needed a giant military anyway. (But I do think we need the jobs making weapons that we'd never use...)