So the big "gaffe" in the 2nd debate was that moderator Candy agreed with Obama that he used the words "act of terror" the day after in the Rose Garden, which embarrassed Romney.
Me? I don't care. I don't blame Obama for not realizing that al Quida might attack an African embassy on the anniversery of Sept 11. (It would be more likely that they'd re-attack New York - but if we had to wait 10 more seconds for airport security just because it was an anniversery- there would be complaints of stupid precautions.)
And it's not like Obama would know 100% of what really happened immediately, as news came in, he revealed the extent of what he was certain. (He might not have revealed everything he suspected, but that's a lot of unsubstantiated rumours going round.)
And yes, "Protesting a Youtube video" could be considered an "act of terror" - in a broad sense. I think if the worst Romney can say about Obama's anti-terrorist record is 4 people dead 100,000 miles away - then Obama must be doing pretty well.
No comments:
Post a Comment